Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÀÓÇöõÆ®¿Í »óºÎº¸Ã¶¹°ÀÇÀÓ»óÀû/½ÇÇèÀû ºÎÀûÇÕ Æò°¡¿¡ °üÇÑ ¹®Çå°íÂû

A literature review on clinical/ laboratory misfit evaluation on implant-prosthesis

´ëÇÑÄ¡°úÀÇ»çÇùȸÁö 2018³â 56±Ç 9È£ p.462 ~ 478
±èÁ¾È¸, Á¶¿õ·¡, °í°æÈ£, ÇãÀ±Çõ, ¹ÚÂùÁø, Á¶¸®¶ó,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±èÁ¾È¸ ( Kim Jong-Hoi ) - °­¸ª¿øÁÖ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
Á¶¿õ·¡ ( Cho Woong-Rae ) - °­¸ª¿øÁÖ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
°í°æÈ£ ( Ko Kyoung-Ho ) - °­¸ª¿øÁÖ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
ÇãÀ±Çõ ( Huh Yoon-Hyuk ) - °­¸ª¿øÁÖ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
¹ÚÂùÁø ( Park Chan-Jin ) - °­¸ª¿øÁÖ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
Á¶¸®¶ó ( Cho Lee-Ra ) - °­¸ª¿øÁÖ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç

Abstract


The presence of implant-prosthesis misfits can cause various complications. It is very important to detect misfits to prevent such complications. There are various evaluation methods for misfit assessment including clinical methods and laboratory in vitro methods. The clinical misfit evaluation includes radiographic analysis, visual observation, probing, Sheffield test, evaluation with disclosing materials, and screw resistance test. The laboratory in vitro evaluation method includes indirect modelling evaluation and direct metrological visualization. Of the indirect modelling methods, photoelastic stress analysis, finite element analysis, strain gauge analysis, and microbial colonization analysis were reviewed. Of the direct metrological visualization, microscopic analysis, 3-D photogrammetric analysis, coordinate measuring analysis, and radiographic analysis were reviewed. In this review, the characteristics, advantages and disadvantages of each method were evaluated.

Å°¿öµå

Implant; Prosthesis; Misfit; Direct metrological visualization; Indirect modelling method; Clinical evaluation method; Laboratory evaluation method

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI